Paper
Using Experimental Economics to Measure Social Capital And Predict Financial Decisions
Does behavior in games predict real financial status of MFIs?
21 pages
This paper's key theme is to establish a direct link from the Trust Game to a propensity to overcome a market failure (i.e., loan repayment). The author conducts a trust game, a public goods game and conducts a survey to measure social capital.
The trust game, which is conducted between two players and an administrator, purports to measure:
- How much one player (A) trusts another player (B), and how trustworthy is Player B with respect to Player A?
The author examines and finds that:
- The General Social Survey's (GSS) questions on trust, fairness, and helping others can predict real financial decisions;
- More positive answers to the GSS questions predict higher repayment and higher savings.
In the Public Goods game, the author assesses that:
- Individuals who contribute more to this game are no more likely (or less likely) to repay their loans.
The paper concludes that:
- A simple Trust game can predict repayment of a loan enforced almost entirely through social pressure and can be endorsed as a valid method to measure trustworthiness, though not as a method to measure trust;
- Individuals identified as "trustworthy" by the Trust game are less likely to default on their loans;
- Trustworthiness is an important component in determining the success of group lending programs. If harnessed and/or identified, lenders can help solve failures observed in the financial markets for the poor.
About this Publication
Published