Paper
Identifying Targeting with Nonparametric Methods: An Application to an Indian Microfinance Program
Do most poverty alleviation programs exclude the poorest in the community?
27 pages
This paper discusses non-parametric methods and statistical tests that are appropriate to assess poverty targeting in public programs. It states that:
- These methods account for the possibility that the population distribution of participants and non-participants cross;
- Crossing points provide the upper bounds on the income of those who have been excluded from the program.
The paper uses two approaches to examine targeting in public programs:
- Parametric models that estimate the probability that a household participates in the program as a function of income or other characteristics of the targeted group;
- Differences in the share of participants and non-participants in some pre-determined intervals of income distribution.
The paper applies these methods to data from a microfinance program in the state of Jharkhand in India, and analyzes:
- Household survey data to compare the composition of newly formed microcredit groups to other randomly chosen households in the area;
- The economic conditions of the members before they received any benefits from the program.
The paper finds that:
- Members of the microfinance program are predominantly poor;
- There is no evidence of stochastic dominance of the distribution of non-members over that of program members;
- The authors' estimation of the crossing point is statistically significant;
- A smaller proportion of members among the poorest households are excluded from village level activity and from government-sponsored programs aimed at poverty alleviation.
About this Publication
Published